Cases

The Broken Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Revisiting Vaibhav v. State of Maharashtra (2025), Author: Prapti VoraStudent, Symbiosis Law School, Nagpur —————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. The Supreme Court reaffirmed that circumstantial evidence must establish a complete and unbroken chain leading exclusively to the guilt of the accused.2. Suspicious post-offence conduct cannot, by itself, substitute […]

Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2017): Constitutionalising the Right to Privacy in India Author: NANDANI SINGHStudent,LLOYD LAW COLLEGE, GREATER NOIDA Author: Shivam KumarStudent, Lloyd law college —————————————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction The Supreme Court of India rendered a landmark constitutional law judgment on 24 August 2017 in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.)

Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. v. Union of India (2019): Recognising Homebuyers as Financial Creditors Under the IBC Author: Rupesh RangaStudent, MDU Center for Professional and Allied Studies, Gurugram ————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction In the Indian real estate sector, delays in project completion and possession of residential units had become increasingly common,

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India: Redefining Forest Governance Through Continuing Mandamus Author: Yedunandan BStudent, Alliance University Bangalore 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India is one of the most influential decisions in Indian environmental law. What began as a petition concerning illegal deforestation in the Nilgiris forests of

Association for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India: Electoral Bonds, Corporate Funding, and the Constitutional Demand for Transparency Author: Priyam PratikStudent, Faculty of Law, University of Allahabad —————————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction Few questions strike more directly at the integrity of a constitutional democracy than this: who finances its elections? The health of an

Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India: Decriminalising Section 377 and Reclaiming Constitutional Morality Author: KIRTI GAUTAMStudent, IPS Academy, Indore, M.P (Affiliated to DAVV, Indore) —————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India is one of the most transformative constitutional decisions in modern Indian jurisprudence. Decided by a Constitution Bench

National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India: Constitutional Recognition of Transgender Rights in India Author: Devika Krishna sStudent, REE NARAYANA GURU college of Legal studies ————————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India is a landmark judgment in Indian constitutional law and human rights jurisprudence. The case marked

Nirmaljit Singh Narula v. Indijobs at Hubpages: Intermediary Liability, Defamation, and the Limits of Safe Harbour Author: Vinayak SStudent, Prof. NR Madhava Menon Interdisciplinary Centre for Research Ethics and Protocols- CUSAT, Ernakulam ——————————————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Nirmaljit Singh Narula v. Indijobs at Hubpages CS (OS) No. 871/2012 Court and Bench: High Court of Delhi,

Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC v. Future Retail Ltd. & Ors.: Validating Emergency Arbitration in India Author: [Full Name Not Provided]Student, [Institution Name Not Provided] 💡 3 Quick Takeaways I. Introduction The Supreme Court of India’s decision in Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC v. Future Retail Ltd. & Ors. represents a landmark development in Indian

Harish Rana v. Union of India: Reaffirming the Right to Die with Dignity Author: Deepti AgrawalStudent, Kanoria School of Law for Women, Jaipur ——————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. Introduction Whether an individual has a right to die with dignity remains one of the most controversial questions in constitutional and medical jurisprudence. The rapid development