Publications - The Lawscape

Balfour v. Balfour [1919]: Why Domestic Promises Are Not Contracts

Balfour v. Balfour [1919]: Why Domestic Promises Are Not Contracts Author: Khan Husnaara Khatoon Iqrar AhmedStudent, Amity Law School —————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. An intention to create legal relations is an essential element of a valid contract — without it, even a clear promise supported by consideration will not be legally enforceable. 2. […]

Balfour v. Balfour [1919]: Why Domestic Promises Are Not Contracts Read More »

Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose (1903): A Minor’s Contract is Void — Not Voidable

Leave a Comment / Cases / The Lawscape

Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose (1903): A Minor’s Contract is Void — Not Voidable Author: Sadhana TiwariStudent, NLIU Bhopal ————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. A contract entered into by a minor is void ab initio under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 — it has no legal existence from the very beginning and cannot be

Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose (1903): A Minor’s Contract is Void — Not Voidable Read More »

Leslie Ltd. v. Sheill [1914]: When Fraud Cannot Override the Protection of Minority

Leave a Comment / Cases / The Lawscape

Leslie Ltd. v. Sheill [1914]: When Fraud Cannot Override the Protection of Minority Author: JyotiStudent, Rayat Bahra College of Law ————————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. A contract entered into by a minor is void — and courts will not allow a creditor to recover money advanced under such a contract by simply re-framing the

Leslie Ltd. v. Sheill [1914]: When Fraud Cannot Override the Protection of Minority Read More »

Durga Prasad v. Baldeo (1881): Past Consideration and the Limits of Contractual Obligation

Leave a Comment / Cases / The Lawscape

Durga Prasad v. Baldeo (1881): Past Consideration and the Limits of Contractual Obligation Author: Krish Gaur Student,Student, Apex School of Law, Apex University, Jaipur. ————————————————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. A promise of guarantee executed after a loan has already been advanced is not legally enforceable — the prior loan constitutes past consideration, which is

Durga Prasad v. Baldeo (1881): Past Consideration and the Limits of Contractual Obligation Read More »

Venkata Chinnaya Rau v. Venkata Ramaya Garu (1882): Third Party Consideration and the Autonomy of Indian Contract Law

Felthouse v. Bindley [1862]: When Silence Is Not Consent

Kedarnath Bhattacharji v. Gorai Mohammed (1886)

Navigating Academic Integrity in Legal Writing Amid AI Advancements

Doctrine of Supervening Impossibility: Meaning, Application, Effects, and Suggestions

Leave a Comment / Articles / Thelawsacpe

Doctrine of Supervening Impossibility: Meaning, Application, Effects, and Suggestions Author: Md. Kibria NurStudent, Southern University Bangladesh —————————————————————————————————————- 3 Quick Takeaways 1. Under Section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a contract becomes void when its performance becomes impossible or unlawful due to an event that neither party could have prevented or foreseen at the

Doctrine of Supervening Impossibility: Meaning, Application, Effects, and Suggestions Read More »

Undue Influence under the Indian Contract Act, 1872: Ensuring Fairness in Contractual Consent

Leave a Comment / Articles / Thelawsacpe

Undue Influence under the Indian Contract Act, 1872: Ensuring Fairness in Contractual Consent Author: Yashoda RajputStudent, Sage University Bhopal —————————————————————————————————————- 3 Quick Takeaways 1. Undue influence under Section 16 doesn’t require threats — it operates through relationships of trust and authority where one party dominates the other’s decision-making. 2. Once a dominant relationship and an

Undue Influence under the Indian Contract Act, 1872: Ensuring Fairness in Contractual Consent Read More »