Cases

Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India: Decriminalising Section 377 and Reclaiming Constitutional Morality Author: Mallika KumariStudent, Amity University Patna ———————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India marked a constitutional turning point by partially striking down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code and decriminalising consensual same-sex relations between […]

Bar Council of India v. A.K. Balaji: Regulating Foreign Lawyers in India’s Legal Profession Author: Avinash Sankar Student, School of legal studies, cochin university of science and technology,kerala —————————————————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction The Supreme Court’s judgment in Bar Council of India v. A.K. Balaji (2018) is the definitive pronouncement on whether foreign lawyers

Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala: Religious Freedom, Freedom of Expression, and Constitutional Tolerance Author: Khushboo GuptaStudent, MKLM’s Adhia College of Law, Mumbai ————————————————————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction Bijoe Emmanuel and Others v. State of Kerala is one of the most significant constitutional decisions concerning the protection of religious freedom and freedom of expression

Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala: Reimagining Equality Through the Sabarimala Judgment Author: MANAN JHAMBStudent, Chandigarh University ————————————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction Indian Young Lawyers Association & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Ors. is one of the most significant constitutional decisions concerning the relationship between religious freedom and fundamental rights in

Constitutionality of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025: Balancing Religious Autonomy and Administrative Reform Author: Shristi SinghStudent, R D. University, Jabalpur ———————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, represents one of the most significant legislative reforms relating to the administration of Waqf properties in India. Introduced with the objective of streamlining the

Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India: Privacy, Dignity, and the Constitutional Future of India Author: Lisa Vipin KhonaStudent, DM HARISH SCHOOL OF LAW, WORLI —————————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India is one of the most transformative constitutional decisions in modern India because it converted privacy

Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala: Faith, Gender, and the Constitution Author: Yadu Krishna K GStudent, Bharata Mata School of Legal Studies, Aluva, Kerala ————————————————————————————————- Author: [Full Name]Student, [Institution Name] 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction There is a hill in Kerala called Sabarimala. On it stands a temple dedicated to Lord Ayyappa. For

Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India: A Constitutional Watershed for Personal Liberty and Due Process Author: MUSKAN KASHYAPStudent, DEEN DAYAL UPADAHYAY UNIVERSITY GORAKHPUR UTTAR PRADESH ——————————————————————————————————————————- ] 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction The case of Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (AIR 1978 SC 597) stands as one of the most transformative judgments in the

Shayara Bano v. Union of India: Triple Talaq, Constitutional Morality, and Gender Justice Author: Hrishikesh Deokar —————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction The decision in Shayara Bano v. Union of India is one of the most significant judgments concerning gender justice and constitutional rights in India. The case dealt with Triple Talaq, or Talaq-e-Biddat, which

Operationalizing Dignity: A Critical Commentary on Harish Rana v. Union of India (2026 INSC 222) and the Judicial Architecture of Passive Euthanasia in India Author: Anitta Lilly JosephStudent, Kochi ————————————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Abstract The Supreme Court of India’s landmark ruling in Harish Rana v. Union of India (2026 INSC 222) constitutes the first