Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India Author: Kiran ChoudharyStudent, Lord’s Universal College of Law ———————————————————————————— Key Takeaways Court and Bench: Supreme Court of India, Seven-Judge Bench comprising M. H. Beg (Chief Justice), Y. V. Chandrachud, V. R. Krishna Iyer, P. N. Bhagwati, N. L. Untwalia, S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, and P. S. Kailasam. Date of
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India Read More »
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 9 SCC 449 Author: Hrudinee Sudip VarsolkarStudent, KES Shri Jayantilal H. Patel Law College ———————————————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways INTRODUCTION The case of Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. is one of the most significant corporate law disputes in India, dealing with
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 9 SCC 449 Read More »
Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala (2018) 10 SCC 689 (Sabarimala Case) Author: Prity BhagatStudent, KES Shri Jayantilal H Patel Law College ——————————————————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways INTRODUCTION The Indian Constitution guarantees both fundamental rights and religious freedom, often requiring courts to strike a delicate balance between the two. One of the most
Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala (2018) 10 SCC 689 (Sabarimala Case) Read More »
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Ganga Pollution Case), 1988 AIR 1115 Author: Vishnupriya Arvind ShuklaStudent, KES Shri Jayantilal H Patel Law College, Mumbai ————————————————————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways INTRODUCTION Environmental protection has emerged as one of the most crucial legal and social concerns in modern India. Rapid industrialization, urbanization, and population growth have significantly
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Ganga Pollution Case), 1988 AIR 1115 Read More »
D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (AIR 1997 SC 610) Author: Harshi PatodiaStudent, KES Shri Jayantilal H Patel Law College ———————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997) is a landmark judgment in which the Supreme Court laid down eleven binding guidelines governing arrest and detention, aimed at preventing custodial violence
D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (AIR 1997 SC 610) Read More »
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala Author: Vidhi SharmaStudent, Prestige University ———————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways The Supreme Court in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) established the Basic Structure Doctrine — holding that while Parliament may amend any provision of the Constitution, it cannot alter or destroy its fundamental identity and essential features.
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala Read More »
Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India and Ors. (AIR 1996, 3 SCC 212) Author: Khushboo Sanjay GuptaStudent, MKLM Adhia College of Law ———————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways The Supreme Court in Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India firmly applied the Polluter Pays Principle — holding that industries responsible for
Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India and Ors. (AIR 1996, 3 SCC 212) Read More »
Rajnesh v. Neha and Ors. Author: Astha Arvind ShuklaStudent, KES Shri Jayantilal H Patel Law College ———————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Rajnesh v. Neha (2021) transformed maintenance law in India by making mandatory financial disclosure a cornerstone of every maintenance proceeding — ending the culture of hidden assets and prolonged procedural uncertainty. The Supreme Court ruled
Rajnesh v. Neha and Ors. Read More »
Working Together: How Human Rights and Transitional Justice Help Societies Heal Author: Abrham Seife MulunehStudent, Bahirdar University ———————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Human rights law and transitional justice are not competing frameworks — they are deeply interdependent: human rights law provides the legal foundation and the duties, while transitional justice provides the practical tools to
Working Together: How Human Rights and Transitional Justice Help Societies Heal Read More »
Pakistan’s 27th Amendment: A Comparative Analysis Author: Alina IjazStudent, National Defence University, Islamabad ———————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Pakistan’s Constitution (Twenty-seventh Amendment) Act, 2025 restructures both the judicial hierarchy and military command architecture — creating a Federal Constitutional Court, weakening judicial transfer protections, and constitutionally entrenching military authority in ways that transform informal power into
Pakistan’s 27th Amendment: A Comparative Analysis Read More »
