Cases

Rajnesh v. Neha and Ors. Author: Astha Arvind ShuklaStudent, KES Shri Jayantilal H Patel Law College ———————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Rajnesh v. Neha (2021) transformed maintenance law in India by making mandatory financial disclosure a cornerstone of every maintenance proceeding — ending the culture of hidden assets and prolonged procedural uncertainty. The Supreme Court ruled

Indra Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma (2013) 15 SCC 755 Author: Soham Tanaji BhosaleStudent, KES Shri Jayantilal H Patel Law College, Mumbai ———————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways INTRODUCTION The evolution of societal norms in India has necessitated a reinterpretation of legal constructs, particularly those concerning familial relationships and marriage. The Indian judiciary, often acting as an

Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1 Author: Asra SiddiquiStudent, City Academy Law college Lucknow University ——————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways INTRODUCTION Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India is a cornerstone judgment and one of the most significant decisions in Indian constitutional history. The Supreme Court affirmed the

Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017) 9 SCC 1 Author: Samiksha Mahendra DhokeStudent, Kes Shri. Jayantilal H. Patel Law College —————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways INTRODUCTION Shayara Bano v. Union of India is a landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of India in 2017. The case is popularly known as the Triple Talaq

Sukhdev Singh v. Sukhbir Kaur (2025) Author: Manan JhambStudent, Chandigarh University ——————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways The Supreme Court held that maintenance can be granted even in void marriages under Sections 24 and 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The judgment adopts a socially responsive interpretation to protect economically vulnerable spouses. It resolves conflicting

Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) Author: Anushka Bharat GavandeStudent, Lords Universal College ——————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court, in a landmark judgment, struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, which provided for the arrest of individuals for posting allegedly offensive content on the internet, thereby upholding freedom

The State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh & Ors. (AIR 1996 SC 1393) Author: Saniya SawStudent, KES’ Shri Jayantilal H Patel Law College ————————————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways ABSTRACT The case of The State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh & Ors. (AIR 1996 SC 1393) is a landmark judgment emphasizing the evidentiary value of the

Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited v. Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors. (2019) Author: Swapnil Prakash ChavanStudent, Nirmal Education Society’s Subhash Desai College of Law (Mumbai University) ———————————————————————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways ABSTRACT The case of Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited v. Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors. is a landmark

Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India and Ors (AIR 2000 SC 3751) Author: Diya Darshan BabelStudent, University of Mumbai ———————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways ABSTRACT The case of Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India and Ors (AIR 2000 SC 3751) is a landmark judgment that highlights the complex relationship between economic development, environmental

Vishaka & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [(1997) 6 S.C.C. 241 (India)] Author: Vanshika HaritwalStudent, Subhash Desai College of Law (Nirmal Education Society’s) ——————————————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Court & Bench: Supreme Court of India; Three-Judge Bench comprising Chief Justice of India J.S. Verma, Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, and B.N. Kirpal, JJ. Date