Child Protection Beyond Formalism: A Critical Commentary on Independent Thought v. Union of India (2017) Author: Sanskriti MishraStudent, NIMS School of Law, NIMS University, Jaipur ———————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. Independent Thought v. Union of India removed the marital rape exception for wives between fifteen and eighteen years of age by reading down Exception

In Re: Assent, Withholding or Reservation of Bills by the Governor and the President of India: Recasting the Constitutional Boundaries of Articles 200 and 201 Author: Srishti singhStudent, Gujarat national law University, silvassa ——————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. The Supreme Court’s advisory opinion in In Re: Assent, Withholding or Reservation of Bills by the

ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. OpenAI Inc.: Adjudicating India’s First AI Copyright Dispute Author: Nikhil SainiStudent, Manipal University Jaipur —————————————————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. OpenAI Inc. is India’s first major copyright dispute to directly examine whether AI training on copyrighted journalistic content is permissible under the Copyright Act, 1957.2.

K. Uma Devi v. Government of Tamil Nadu: Maternity Benefits, Reproductive Dignity, and the Limits of the Two-Child Norm Author: SUNKARI VAISHNAVIStudent, PG COLLEGE OF LAW HYDERABAD ——————————————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. K. Uma Devi v. Government of Tamil Nadu reaffirmed that maternity benefits are not a mere statutory concession but are closely tied

X v. Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department: Reproductive Autonomy, Equality, and Abortion Rights Beyond Marriage Author: Kartik m KhanaganniStudent, R.L.Law College, Belagavi ———————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. X v. Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department affirmed that unmarried women are entitled to seek termination of pregnancy under the Medical Termination of

Harish Rana v. Union of India (2026): Operationalising the Right to Die with Dignity under Article 21 .Author: Hiba IliyasStudent, UNiversity of Lucknow, Lucknow —————————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. The Supreme Court recognised Clinically Assisted Nutrition and Hydration (CANH) as withdrawable medical treatment rather than basic care.2. The judgment transformed the constitutional right to

S.R. Bommai v. Union of India: Federalism, Secularism, and the Constitutional Limits of Article 356 Author: Sanvi OliStudent, IMS Unison University, Dehradun ——————————————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. S.R. Bommai v. Union of India transformed the constitutional understanding of Article 356 by subjecting Presidential Proclamations to judicial review and limiting the arbitrary use of President’s

Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan: Judicial Recognition of Workplace Sexual Harassment as a Constitutional Wrong Author: Aditi Singh PariharStudent, Shambhunath Institute of Law, Prayagraj ————————————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan recognised workplace sexual harassment as a violation of women’s fundamental rights under Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21 of the

Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.: Unilateral Offers, Acceptance by Performance, and the Binding Force of Advertisements Author: Amandeep KaurStudent, University of Nicosia, Nicosia ———————————————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. is a landmark contract law case establishing that an advertisement can amount to a binding unilateral offer when it