Sukhdev Singh v. Sukhbir Kaur (2025)

Sukhdev Singh v. Sukhbir Kaur (2025) Author: Manan JhambStudent, Chandigarh University ——————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways The Supreme Court held that maintenance can be granted even in void marriages under Sections 24 and 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The judgment adopts a socially responsive interpretation to protect economically vulnerable spouses. It resolves conflicting […]

Sukhdev Singh v. Sukhbir Kaur (2025) Read More »

Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015)

Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) Author: Anushka Bharat GavandeStudent, Lords Universal College ——————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court, in a landmark judgment, struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, which provided for the arrest of individuals for posting allegedly offensive content on the internet, thereby upholding freedom

Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) Read More »

The State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh & Ors. (AIR 1996 SC 1393)

The State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh & Ors. (AIR 1996 SC 1393) Author: Saniya SawStudent, KES’ Shri Jayantilal H Patel Law College ————————————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways ABSTRACT The case of The State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh & Ors. (AIR 1996 SC 1393) is a landmark judgment emphasizing the evidentiary value of the

The State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh & Ors. (AIR 1996 SC 1393) Read More »

Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited v. Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors. (2019)

Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited v. Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors. (2019) Author: Swapnil Prakash ChavanStudent, Nirmal Education Society’s Subhash Desai College of Law (Mumbai University) ———————————————————————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways ABSTRACT The case of Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited v. Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors. is a landmark

Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited v. Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors. (2019) Read More »

Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India and Ors (AIR 2000 SC 3751)

Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India and Ors (AIR 2000 SC 3751) Author: Diya Darshan BabelStudent, University of Mumbai ———————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways ABSTRACT The case of Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India and Ors (AIR 2000 SC 3751) is a landmark judgment that highlights the complex relationship between economic development, environmental

Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India and Ors (AIR 2000 SC 3751) Read More »

Vishaka & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [(1997) 6 S.C.C. 241 (India)]

Vishaka & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [(1997) 6 S.C.C. 241 (India)] Author: Vanshika HaritwalStudent, Subhash Desai College of Law (Nirmal Education Society’s) ——————————————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Court & Bench: Supreme Court of India; Three-Judge Bench comprising Chief Justice of India J.S. Verma, Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, and B.N. Kirpal, JJ. Date

Vishaka & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [(1997) 6 S.C.C. 241 (India)] Read More »

FROM SEDITION TO SOVEREIGNTY: FREE SPEECH AND NATIONAL SECURITY UNDER THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023

FROM SEDITION TO SOVEREIGNTY: FREE SPEECH AND NATIONAL SECURITY UNDER THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Author: Pooja Bujji Shridharla Student, KES Shri Jayantilal H Patel Law College, Mumbai ————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, replaces the colonial “sedition” (Section 124A IPC) with Section 152, shifting the focus from protecting

FROM SEDITION TO SOVEREIGNTY: FREE SPEECH AND NATIONAL SECURITY UNDER THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Read More »

REHABILITATION AND LEGAL RIGHTS OF RAPE AND ACID ATTACK SURVIVORS IN INDIA

REHABILITATION AND LEGAL RIGHTS OF RAPE AND ACID ATTACK SURVIVORS IN INDIA Author: Netra Gayatri Rajesh BhagadiaStudent, Kes shri Jayantilal H. Patel Law College —————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. Indian jurisprudence is transitioning from a colonial punishment-centric model to a restorative justice model that prioritizes victim rehabilitation. 2. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and

REHABILITATION AND LEGAL RIGHTS OF RAPE AND ACID ATTACK SURVIVORS IN INDIA Read More »

Constitutional Remedies Under Article 32

Constitutional Remedies Under Article 32 Author: Prajakta Patil Student, Punyashlok Ahilya Devi Holkar University Solapur —————————————————————————- 3 Quick Takeaways Abstract Fundamental Rights are essential for the moral and material development of individuals. It is through Fundamental Rights that people are best able to develop their personalities and realise their potential. These rights are guaranteed by

Constitutional Remedies Under Article 32 Read More »

Close-in-Age Exceptions and the POCSO Framework: Rethinking Proportionality in Adolescent Relationships

Close-in-Age Exceptions and the POCSO Framework: Rethinking Proportionality in Adolescent Relationships Author: Priyanka Pawar Student, Government Law College, Mumbai ————————————————- 3 Quick Takeaways Abstract The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) is an Indian law formulated for the protection of minors against sexual exploitation and abuse. While the protective objective of the

Close-in-Age Exceptions and the POCSO Framework: Rethinking Proportionality in Adolescent Relationships Read More »