The Injunction Trap: Personality Rights, AI Deepfakes, and India’s Missing Law

The Injunction Trap: Personality Rights, AI Deepfakes, and India’s Missing Law Author: Akshita AgrawalStudent, Iilm university , greater noida ——————————————————————————– Abstract AI-generated deepfakes raise serious questions about personal identity, dignity, privacy and the adequacy of existing legal remedies. By reproducing a person’s face, voice or likeness without consent, these technologies can damage reputations, disrupt careers

The Injunction Trap: Personality Rights, AI Deepfakes, and India’s Missing Law Read More »

Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015): Online Free Speech, Constitutional Safeguards and Intermediary Liability

Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015): Online Free Speech, Constitutional Safeguards and Intermediary Liability Author, Akshita AgarwalStudent, Iilm university , greater noida ——————————————————————————- Case Citation: (2015) 5 SCC 1 Court: Supreme Court of IndiaBench: Justice J. Chelameswar and Justice R.F. NarimanDate of Judgment: 24 March 2015 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Facts Section 66A was

Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015): Online Free Speech, Constitutional Safeguards and Intermediary Liability Read More »

Selvi v. State of Karnataka (2010): Self-Incrimination, Mental Privacy and the Constitutional Limits of Investigative Techniques

Selvi v. State of Karnataka (2010): Self-Incrimination, Mental Privacy and the Constitutional Limits of Investigative Techniques Author: Srushti Prakash GadhaveStudent, National Forensic Sciences University ————————————————————————————————————- Case Citation: Selvi & Ors. v. State of Karnataka, (2010) 7 SCC 263Court: Supreme Court of IndiaBench: Three-Judge Bench comprising Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan, Justice R.V. Raveendran and Justice J.M.

Selvi v. State of Karnataka (2010): Self-Incrimination, Mental Privacy and the Constitutional Limits of Investigative Techniques Read More »

Sanjay Kumar Gupta v. Sony Pictures Networks India Pvt. Ltd. (2018): Copyright Protection, the Idea–Expression Dichotomy and Television Formats

Sanjay Kumar Gupta v. Sony Pictures Networks India Pvt. Ltd. (2018): Copyright Protection, the Idea–Expression Dichotomy and Television Formats Author: Santhoshini R.Student, SASTRA Deemed University —————————————————————— Case Citation: AIR 2018 Del 169; (2018) 251 DLT 688; (2018) 75 PTC 562 (Del)Court: Delhi High CourtJudge: Justice Valmiki J. MehtaJurisdiction: Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of

Sanjay Kumar Gupta v. Sony Pictures Networks India Pvt. Ltd. (2018): Copyright Protection, the Idea–Expression Dichotomy and Television Formats Read More »

S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994): Judicial Review, Federalism and the Constitutional Limits of Article 356

S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994): Judicial Review, Federalism and the Constitutional Limits of Article 356 Author: Arpita RajawatStudent, Mata Sundri College For Women, University of Delhi ——————————————————————————————————————- Case Citation: (1994) 3 SCC 1Court: Supreme Court of IndiaBench: Nine-Judge Constitution Bench comprising S. Ratnavel Pandian, A.M. Ahmadi, Kuldip Singh, J.S. Verma, P.B. Sawant, K.

S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994): Judicial Review, Federalism and the Constitutional Limits of Article 356 Read More »

Rolling Up Risk: Serial Acquisitions, Private Equity and the Antitrust Blind Spot in the U.S. and India

Rolling Up Risk: Serial Acquisitions, Private Equity and the Antitrust Blind Spot in the U.S. and India Author: Pasi NivedithaStudent, SBRTM Law College affiliated to Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa, Andhrapradesh, India ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Abstract Private equity-driven roll-up strategies involve acquiring numerous smaller businesses within the same sector and consolidating them into a

Rolling Up Risk: Serial Acquisitions, Private Equity and the Antitrust Blind Spot in the U.S. and India Read More »

Right to Speedy Trial under Article 21: Promise vs. Reality

Right to Speedy Trial under Article 21: Promise vs. Reality Author: Anshika SrivastavaStudent, Law centre II, Faculty of law ,DU —————————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction The importance of Article 21 of the Constitution of India lies in its guarantee that no person shall be deprived of life or personal liberty except according to a

Right to Speedy Trial under Article 21: Promise vs. Reality Read More »

Rationality on Trial: Cognitive Bias, Prejudice, and the Psychological Limits of Criminal Justice Decision-Making

Rationality on Trial: Cognitive Bias, Prejudice, and the Psychological Limits of Criminal Justice Decision-Making Author: Ramsha SaeedB.A. LL.B. Candidate, Shambhunath Institute of Law, Prayagraj, India ———————————————————————————————————————— Research Interests: Criminal law, behavioural law and economics, and legal psychology. 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Abstract Criminal justice systems worldwide presume that legal actors, including judges, investigators, prosecutors and

Rationality on Trial: Cognitive Bias, Prejudice, and the Psychological Limits of Criminal Justice Decision-Making Read More »

Problems Faced by Women in Society and the Family: Legal Protections and Continuing Challenges

Problems Faced by Women in Society and the Family: Legal Protections and Continuing Challenges Author: Sangeetha MathiyazhaganStudent, Government law college, vellore ————————————————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction Women play a vital role in the development of a country. Despite their contributions, they continue to face numerous challenges, including sexual harassment, rape, acid attacks, domestic violence

Problems Faced by Women in Society and the Family: Legal Protections and Continuing Challenges Read More »

Pooranmal v. State of Rajasthan (2026): Electronic Evidence, Forensic Integrity and the Chain of Circumstantial Evidence

Pooranmal v. State of Rajasthan (2026): Electronic Evidence, Forensic Integrity and the Chain of Circumstantial Evidence Author: Saloni MongaStudent, Meerut College, Meerut Affiliated To Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut ——————————————————————————————————————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction The increasing use of technology in criminal investigations has transformed the manner in which courts assess criminal liability. Evidence such

Pooranmal v. State of Rajasthan (2026): Electronic Evidence, Forensic Integrity and the Chain of Circumstantial Evidence Read More »