Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC v. Future Retail Ltd. & Ors.: Validating Emergency Arbitration in India Author: [Full Name Not Provided]Student, [Institution Name Not Provided] 💡 3 Quick Takeaways I. Introduction The Supreme Court of India’s decision in Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC v. Future Retail Ltd. & Ors. represents a landmark development in Indian […]

Harish Rana v. Union of India: Reaffirming the Right to Die with Dignity Author: Deepti AgrawalStudent, Kanoria School of Law for Women, Jaipur ——————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. Introduction Whether an individual has a right to die with dignity remains one of the most controversial questions in constitutional and medical jurisprudence. The rapid development

Christian Louboutin SAS v. Yves Saint Laurent America Inc.: Colour Trademarks, Aesthetic Functionality, and the Limits of Fashion IP Author: Sakshi ShuklaStudent, Manipal University Jaipur, —————————————————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways I. Introduction When the Second Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals decided Christian Louboutin SAS v. Yves Saint Laurent America Inc. in 2012,

Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan: Article 142 and the Recognition of Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage Author: SANIKA DEHURYStudent, National Law University, Odisha, city- Cuttack —————————————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction Marriage occupies a significant place in Indian society and is governed by a wide framework of personal and statutory laws. Yet, where a marriage has

K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra: Reassessing Grave and Sudden Provocation under Indian Criminal Law Author: Aafreen KamilStudent, Andaman Law College, Sri Vijaya Puram ————————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction Few criminal cases in post-independence India have captured the public imagination—or provoked as much legal debate—as K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra. At its core,

Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh: Mandatory FIR Registration and the Limits of Preliminary Inquiry Author: Deepika goriparthiStudent, Koneru Lakshmaiah University, Vijayawada Author: Syed.ArshilStudent,Koneru Lakshmaiah University ————————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh is a landmark decision in Indian criminal jurisprudence concerning the registration of First Information Reports

Selvi v. State of Karnataka: Safeguarding the Right Against Self-Incrimination in the Age of Scientific Investigation Author: JYOTHIKA K GStudent,Mar Gregorios College of Law, Thiruvananthapuram ——————————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction Selvi & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Anr. is a landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India on the constitutional validity of

Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan: Constitutionalising Workplace Protection Against Sexual Harassment Author: SHRIYA VSStudent, Mar Gregosios college of Law, Thiruvananthapuram ————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction In the modern era, women have become an essential component of the workforce and have made an immense contribution to the economic, social, and professional development of society. However,

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: Reconsidering Constitutional Protection of Abortion Rights in the United States Author: AYUSHI RATHOREStudent,acropolis institue of law indore ————————————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction The decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization represents one of the most significant constitutional developments in contemporary American jurisprudence. Delivered by the United States