Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India: Decriminalising Section 377 and Reclaiming Constitutional Morality Author: KIRTI GAUTAMStudent, IPS Academy, Indore, M.P (Affiliated to DAVV, Indore) —————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India is one of the most transformative constitutional decisions in modern Indian jurisprudence. Decided by a Constitution Bench

National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India: Constitutional Recognition of Transgender Rights in India Author: Devika Krishna sStudent, REE NARAYANA GURU college of Legal studies ————————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India is a landmark judgment in Indian constitutional law and human rights jurisprudence. The case marked

Nirmaljit Singh Narula v. Indijobs at Hubpages: Intermediary Liability, Defamation, and the Limits of Safe Harbour Author: Vinayak SStudent, Prof. NR Madhava Menon Interdisciplinary Centre for Research Ethics and Protocols- CUSAT, Ernakulam ——————————————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Nirmaljit Singh Narula v. Indijobs at Hubpages CS (OS) No. 871/2012 Court and Bench: High Court of Delhi,

Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC v. Future Retail Ltd. & Ors.: Validating Emergency Arbitration in India Author: [Full Name Not Provided]Student, [Institution Name Not Provided] 💡 3 Quick Takeaways I. Introduction The Supreme Court of India’s decision in Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC v. Future Retail Ltd. & Ors. represents a landmark development in Indian

Harish Rana v. Union of India: Reaffirming the Right to Die with Dignity Author: Deepti AgrawalStudent, Kanoria School of Law for Women, Jaipur ——————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. Introduction Whether an individual has a right to die with dignity remains one of the most controversial questions in constitutional and medical jurisprudence. The rapid development

Christian Louboutin SAS v. Yves Saint Laurent America Inc.: Colour Trademarks, Aesthetic Functionality, and the Limits of Fashion IP Author: Sakshi ShuklaStudent, Manipal University Jaipur, —————————————————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways I. Introduction When the Second Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals decided Christian Louboutin SAS v. Yves Saint Laurent America Inc. in 2012,

Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan: Article 142 and the Recognition of Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage Author: SANIKA DEHURYStudent, National Law University, Odisha, city- Cuttack —————————————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction Marriage occupies a significant place in Indian society and is governed by a wide framework of personal and statutory laws. Yet, where a marriage has

K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra: Reassessing Grave and Sudden Provocation under Indian Criminal Law Author: Aafreen KamilStudent, Andaman Law College, Sri Vijaya Puram ————————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction Few criminal cases in post-independence India have captured the public imagination—or provoked as much legal debate—as K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra. At its core,

Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh: Mandatory FIR Registration and the Limits of Preliminary Inquiry Author: Deepika goriparthiStudent, Koneru Lakshmaiah University, Vijayawada Author: Syed.ArshilStudent,Koneru Lakshmaiah University ————————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh is a landmark decision in Indian criminal jurisprudence concerning the registration of First Information Reports