Selvi v. State of Karnataka: Safeguarding the Right Against Self-Incrimination in the Age of Scientific Investigation Author: JYOTHIKA K GStudent,Mar Gregorios College of Law, Thiruvananthapuram ——————————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction Selvi & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Anr. is a landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India on the constitutional validity of

Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan: Constitutionalising Workplace Protection Against Sexual Harassment Author: SHRIYA VSStudent, Mar Gregosios college of Law, Thiruvananthapuram ————————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction In the modern era, women have become an essential component of the workforce and have made an immense contribution to the economic, social, and professional development of society. However,

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: Reconsidering Constitutional Protection of Abortion Rights in the United States Author: AYUSHI RATHOREStudent,acropolis institue of law indore ————————————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction The decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization represents one of the most significant constitutional developments in contemporary American jurisprudence. Delivered by the United States

K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra: Emotion, Provocation, and the Limits of Sympathy in Criminal Law Author: Simran SinghStudent, Bharati Vidyapeeth, New law college, Pune ————————————————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways Introduction The case of K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra is one of the most talked-about criminal law cases in India. Even today, it continues

Donoghue v Stevenson: The Case That Gave Modern Negligence Its Duty of Care Author: Dondavis Chisom DavidStudent, Nnamdi Azikiwe University (Akwa, Nigeria) ———————————————————————————— 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. Donoghue v Stevenson established the modern concept of duty of care through Lord Atkin’s “Neighbour Principle.”2. The House of Lords held that a manufacturer may owe a

Harish Rana v. Union of India: Passive Euthanasia, CANH Withdrawal, and the Right to Die with Dignity Author: NAMANROOP KAURStudent, Khalsa College Of Law, Amritsar Co – Author: Iqroop KaurStudent, Guru Nanak Dev University ————————————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. Harish Rana v. Union of India is a significant development in India’s euthanasia jurisprudence because

Munawar Harun Shah v. State of Maharashtra: Delay, Death Row, and the Limits of Reformative Justice Author: Ashika DStudent, Government Law College, Chengalpattu ———————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. Munawar Harun Shah v. State of Maharashtra addressed whether prolonged delay in the execution of a death sentence and evidence of reform in prison could justify

Hedley Byrne & Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners Ltd.: Negligent Misstatement and the Expansion of Tortious Liability for Pure Economic Loss Author: Beckshite Justice ChukwujiukahStudent, University of Jos, ———————————————————————————– 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. Hedley Byrne & Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners Ltd. marked a major turning point in common law by recognising

RIT Foundation v. Union of India: Consent, Constitutional Morality, and the Marital Rape Exception Author: Manjiri VaidyaStudent, Government New Law College Indore ————————————————————————————- 💡 3 Quick Takeaways 1. RIT Foundation v. Union of India placed the marital rape exception at the centre of constitutional scrutiny by questioning whether marriage can negate a woman’s right to